Transportation Infrastrucre in the Soviet Union : a quick lesson.

Transportation infrastructure, for the purposes of this paper is going to be limited to roads and industrial rail for freight and passenger services. Throughout the Cold War, the Soviet Union set the model for infrastructure development in centrally planned economies with the “neglect of transport costs in location decisions [and] very intensive use of rail and freight services” (Aghion and Schankerman 1999). Although there was some development of passenger rail and personal transportation, centrally planned government tended to focus freight rail in order to transport manufactured goods to market. The general market benefits of building infrastructure are wide spread, and involve lowering the cost of the transportation of goods, while also providing incentives for new firms to enter into the market. (Aghion and Schankerman 1999)

A good majority of the development of Soviet rail lines and transportation were outlined prior to the advent of the Second World War and were expressed in the various “Five Year Plans” that were developed until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. As a whole, “except for the old historical centers, almost all of Russian urban growth has taken place during the socialist era…[and] the fact that urban development took place in a period when land was nationalized and administratively allocated…has had a very profound impact on the internal organization of Russian cities” (Bertaud and Renaud 1994). Land allocation in a nation without free markets led to an overdevelopment of industry and rail lines that would likely not have naturally occurred. By 1993, the former territory of the Soviet Union had approximately 140km/100,000 of the population for rail density and only approximately 85 km/100,000 of population of road density. Although the density of roads was comparable to the European Union (EU) in 1993 which had approximately 100 km/100,000 of population the density of rail between the show an even larger disparity with the EU having only 50 km/100,000 of population. (Aghion and Schankerman 1999) Although the Soviet Union had developed a significant amount of rail, most of those lines remained within the borders of the newly formed Russia, leaving only about 35 km/100,000 of population in the remaining CIS states with Russia having just over 100 km/100,000 of population for rail density.

The under-development of road transportation was intended under the central planning of the Soviet Union. (IRU, 2002) For the Soviet Union the emphasis on rail was due to the association with industry and strength, as well as created a steel industry for creating the rails and equipment. The legacy of rail in the Soviet Union left a solid network of freight rail, with no real passenger rail or road alternative to travel. Although the rails were useful for the initial industrial development of the nations, unlike most other states, the Soviet Union did not turn to the development of roads or truck-based transit of goods.

References Listed

Aghion, Philippe and Mark Schankerman. (1999) “Competition, Entry and the Social Returns to Infrastructure in Transition Economies”. Econimics of Transition. Vol. 7 (1) 1999, 70-101.

Ayittey, George B.N. (2006), Africa Unchained: The Blueprint for Africa's Future, New
York: Palgrave Macmillan

Bertaud, Alain and Bertrand Renaud. (1994). “Cities Without Land Markets: Lessons of the Failed Socialist Experiment”. World Bank Discussion Papers. Washington DC.

“CIA- World Fact Book”. (2009) < https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-

factbook/index.html>.

Feinberg, Robert M. and Mieke Meurs. (2005) “Market Reform, Infrastructure and Exchange Rate Passthrough in Central and Eastern Europe”. Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 17, No.1, March 2005.

Graham, Stephen. (2000) “Constructing Premium Network Spaces: Reflections on Infrastructure Networks and Contemporary Urban Development”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. Vol. 24.1, March 2000.

Greive, Malcolm J (1992-1993). “International Assistance and Democracy: Assessing Efforts to Assist Post-Communist Development”. Studies in Comparative International Development, Winter 1992-1993, Vol. 27, No. 4, 80-101.

IRU (2001). Competition in East-West Road Transport Markets: Providing Opportunities for All.

IRU (2003). Road Transport in Russia 2002-2003. International Road Transport Union.


Lewis, John P. and Ishan Kapur (1973). The World Bank Group, Multilateral Aid, and the 1970s.

Nijkamp, Peter and Sytze A. Reinstra (1995). “Private Sector Involvement in Financing and Operating Transport Infrastructure”. The Annals of Regional Science. Vol 29: 221-235.

“Rail and Trade Transport Facilitation” Report No. AB3387. World Bank, Project Papers. (2009). < http://web.worldbank.org/external/projects/>

Rietveld, Piet and Frank Bruinsma. (1998) Is Transport Infrastructure Effective? Springer.

“South-West Roads: Western Europe-Western China International Transit Corridor”. Project No. P099270. World Bank Project Database (2009).

Tak, Herman G. Van and Anadarup Ray (1971). “The Economic Benefits of Road Transport Projects”. World Bank Staff Occasional Papers. IBRD, 1971.

“The World Bank, Mapped” (2009). < http://geo.worldbank.org/>

Woods, Ngaire (2006). The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and Their Borrowers. Cornell University Press. “World Bank: Project Database” (2009).